Avid Editor's Insights

Archive for May 17th, 2008

DUTCH POLICE ARREST CARTOONIST

Posted by avideditor on May 17, 2008

Be careful what you draw. It might offend the “religion of peace”. I think these cartoons are great and represent a truth in regard to the Jihadist.

 


Although I don’t argree with this site all the time I think Brussels Journal got this right. 

The Dutch authorities have arrested the cartoonist Gregorius Nekschot (a pseudonym. Nekschot means deathblow, litt: “shot in the back of the neck” [An interview with Nekschot here]). The judicial authorities in Amsterdam said yesterday that the cartoonist was arrested as a suspect for the criminal offense of “publishing cartoons which are discriminating for Muslims and people with dark skin.”

 

Posted in Islam | Tagged: , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

LGF’s great Rant on Obama

Posted by avideditor on May 17, 2008

It is great to see Charles write more. I hope he keeps it up. I think he is exposing the media bias for Obama. Read my previous post on Obama

 

Crybabies Say What?

I’m a little amazed that there are still Obama Democrats out there on all the talk shows today, whining and spinning and faux-seething about the President’s “appeasement” remarks in Israel. They want to look tough to the petulant Nutroots base, to the Kos Kids and the DUmmies and the Olberthings. They want to look different from John Kerry, who let himself be “swift-boated.”

They refuse to learn the lesson: “swift-boating” worked not because Kerry was a wimp about it (although he was), but because there was substance to a lot of their allegations. When you whine and complain about “unfair remarks,” but those remarks contain more than a grain of truth, it’s obvious to a lot of people—even to supporters. And whining doesn’t generally play well in the US.

The Obama camp is playing purely reactive politics, and in this case it’s over-reactivepolitics. I don’t think the American public is buying it, despite the deluge of desperately yapping Dems in the media.

Posted in Media Bias, Obama | Tagged: , , , | Leave a Comment »

Interview: Al Dura Affair Exposes Media Bias

Posted by avideditor on May 17, 2008

Watch the great interview at Democracy Broadcast News. 

‘Fabricated Al-Dura video generated false bias against Israel; eased West’s resistance to Islamization’- Philippe Karsenty

Posted in Israel, Media Bias, video | Tagged: , , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

Obama the Appeaser

Posted by avideditor on May 17, 2008

My previous posts on Obama. 

Obama is the Neville Chamberlain of our time. He will destroy America. I found this at Pat Dollard. 

Obama An Appeaser? How Fucking Dare You!

Only idiot savages offer appeasements…what you really must do, is fucking kill the beast. Please note where that fucking monkey is lying, the actual physical locale.

Mark Steyn in the OC Register this morning…

…Barack Obama decided that the president’s speech was really about him, and he didn’t care for it. He didn’t put it quite as bluntly as he did with the Rev. Wright, but the message was the same: “That’s enough. That’s a show of disrespect to me.” And, taking their cue from the soon-to-be nominee’s weirdly petty narcissism, Nancy Pelosi, John Kerry, Joe Biden and Co. piled on to deplore Bush’s outrageous, unacceptable, unpresidential, outrageously unacceptable and unacceptably unpresidential behavior.

Honestly. What a bunch of self-absorbed ninnies…

I have to say that I think John McCain’s humble and aristocratic statement “I plan to run a civil campaign, ‘my friends’….” is noble, and right, and just, and good, and will lose him the Presidency. If he is smart, which I thnk he is, he will wage the dirtiest war on earth against Obama via surrogates while trying tomaintain a “Gentleman’s Air” but the bottom line is when they get on that debate stage, baby, its jugular time and the warrior in McCain needs to come out.

He needs to get fucking down and dirty because this ain’t the keys to the city of San Francisco that get handed over at the end of this thing…

The audacity of this dope, Barck Hussein Obama is clear…check out Mark Steyn’s article:

“That’s enough. That – that’s a show of disrespect to me.”

That was Barack Obama, a couple of weeks back, explaining why he was casting the Rev. Jeremiah Wright into outer darkness. It’s one thing to wallow in “adolescent grandiosity” (as Scott Johnson of the Powerline Web site called it) when it’s a family dispute between you and your pastor of 20 years. It’s quite another to do so when it’s the 60th anniversary celebrations of one of America’s closest allies.

President Bush was in Israel the other day and gave a speech to the Knesset. Its perspective was summed up by his closing anecdote – a departing British officer in May 1948 handing the iron bar to the Zion Gate to a trembling rabbi and telling him it was the first time in 18 centuries that a key to the gates of the Jerusalem was in the hands of a Jew. In other words, it was a big-picture speech, referencing the Holocaust, the pogroms, Masada – and the challenges that lie ahead. Sen. Obama was not mentioned in the text. No Democrat was mentioned, save for President Truman, in the context of his recognition of the new state of Israel when it was a mere 11 minutes old.

Nonetheless, Barack Obama decided that the president’s speech was really about him, and he didn’t care for it. He didn’t put it quite as bluntly as he did with the Rev. Wright, but the message was the same: “That’s enough. That’s a show of disrespect to me.” And, taking their cue from the soon-to-be nominee’s weirdly petty narcissism, Nancy Pelosi, John Kerry, Joe Biden and Co. piled on to deplore Bush’s outrageous, unacceptable, unpresidential, outrageously unacceptable and unacceptably unpresidential behavior.

Honestly. What a bunch of self-absorbed ninnies. Here’s what the president said:

“Some seem to believe that we should negotiate with the terrorists and radicals, as if some ingenious argument will persuade them they have been wrong all along. We have heard this foolish delusion before. As Nazi tanks crossed into Poland in 1939, an American senator declared: ‘Lord, if I could only have talked to Hitler, all this might have been avoided.’ We have an obligation to call this what it is – the false comfort of appeasement, which has been repeatedly discredited by history.”

It says something for Democrat touchiness that the minute a guy makes a generalized observation about folks who appease terrorists and dictators the Dems assume: Hey, they’re talking about me. Actually, he wasn’t – or, to be more precise, he wasn’t talking onlyabout you.

Yes, there are plenty of Democrats who are in favor of negotiating with our enemies, and a few Republicans, too – President Bush’s pal James Baker, whose Iraq Study Group was full of proposals to barter with Iran and Syria and everybody else. But that general line is also taken by at least three of Tony Blair’s former Cabinet ministers and his senior policy adviser, and by the leader of Canada’s New Democratic Party and by a whole bunch of bigshot Europeans. It’s not a Democrat election policy, it’s an entire worldview. Even Barack Obama can’t be so vain as to think his fly-me-to-[insert name of enemy here]concept is an original idea.

Increasingly, the Western world has attitudes rather than policies. It’s one thing to talk as a means to an end. But these days, for most midlevel powers, talks arethe end, talks without end. Because that’s what civilized nations like doing – chit-chatting, shooting the breeze, having tea and crumpets, talking talking talking. Uncivilized nations like torturing dissidents, killing civilians, bombing villages, doing doing doing. It’s easier to get the doers to pass themselves off as talkers then to get the talkers to rouse themselves to do anything.

And, as the Iranians understand, talks provide a splendid cover for getting on with anything you want to do. If, say, you want to get on with your nuclear program relatively undisturbed, the easiest way to do it is to enter years of endless talks with the Europeans over said nuclear program. That’s why that Hamas honcho endorsed Obama: They know he’s their best shot at getting a European foreign minister installed as president of the United States.

Mo Mowlam was Britain’s Northern Ireland secretary and oversaw the process by which the IRA’s Gerry Adams and Martin McGuinness became ministers of a Crown they decline to recognize. By 2004, she was calling for Osama bin Laden to be invited to “the negotiating table,” having concluded he was no different from Adams: Stern fellow, lots of blood on his hands, but no sense getting on your high horse about all that; let’s find out what he wants and give him part of it.

In his 2002 letter to the United States, bin Laden has a lot of grievances, from America’s refusal to implement Sharia law to Jew-controlled usury to the lack of punishment for “President Clinton’s immoral acts.” Like Barack Obama’s pastor, bin Laden shares the view that AIDS is a “Satanic American invention.” Obviously, there are items on the agenda that the free world can never concede on – “President Clinton’s immoral acts” – but who’s to say most of the rest isn’t worth chewing over?

This will be the fault line in the post-Bush war debate over the next few years. Are the political ambitions of the broader jihad totalitarian, genocidal, millenarian – in a word, nuts? Or are they negotiable? President Bush knows where he stands. Just before the words that Barack Obama took umbrage at, he said:

“There are good and decent people who cannot fathom the darkness in these men and try to explain away their words. It’s natural, but it is deadly wrong. As witnesses to evil in the past, we carry a solemn responsibility to take these words seriously.”

Here are some words of Hussein Massawi, the former leader of Hezbollah:

“We are not fighting so that you will offer us something. We are fighting to eliminate you.”

Are his actions consistent with those words? Amazingly so. So, too, are those of Hezbollah’s patrons in Tehran.

President Reagan talked with the Soviets while pushing ahead with the deployment of Cruise and Pershing missiles in Europe. He spoke softly – after getting himself a bigger stick. Sen. Obama is proposing to reward a man who pledges to wipe Israel off the map with a presidential photo-op to which he will bring not even a twig. No wonder he’s so twitchy about it.

Mark Steyn in the OC Register.

Posted in Obama | Tagged: , , | Leave a Comment »

 
%d bloggers like this: