Avid Editor's Insights

Archive for May, 2008

Nancy Pelosi thinks Iran is behind our success in Iraq instead of the cause of trouble

Posted by avideditor on May 30, 2008

Pelosi sounds more like the speaker of the house in Iran. Despite sharing opposite values in everything except for a shared hatred of America, Pelosi gives the people that are funding and supplying most of the insurgency credit for the success of the surge. Iran is trying its best to kill as many of our heros as possible but Pelosi is in la la land. Libtards like her are allowing Iran to build nukes and kill our soldiers. Bomb Iran now before it is too late. Iran is going to sneek a nuke into the US and blow up a major city and try to nuke Israel the second it gets the bomb. Time is ticking. Someone really needs to check the sanity of some of the people running our government. The thought of Pelosi being 3rd in line for the presidency scares the hell out of me. 

Konservo has the audio of the speech on his site but I don’t agree with his thoughts on Pelosi pandering to the Israelis. Saying she is behind more talks does nothing to stop Iran from nuking Tel Aviv. Keep in mind Israel is just the little Satin to the loons in Iran. Big Satan is the USA. Iran controls Hezbollah which has sleeper cells in North America and Military bases in South America. The only solution is to bomb Iran before they bomb us. 

Commentary has a more scholarly analysis. It is from the editor who wrote. The Case to Bomb Iran Have any of my readers read Podhoretz’s World War IV? I have been wanting to read it. Does it have any mind blowing insight or is it already dated?


Pelosi Credits Iran’s “Goodwill” for Surge Success

In an interview yesterday with the San Francisco Chronicle, Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi claimed the U.S. troop surge failed to accomplish its goal. She then partially credited the success of the troop surge to “the goodwill of the Iranians,” claiming that they were responsible for ending violence in the southern city of Basra.

Read the rest of this entry »

Posted in America, Iran | Tagged: , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments »

Fight terror by buying Hybrids: The best Hybrid Commercial Ever!

Posted by avideditor on May 30, 2008

Fight terror by buying Hybrids is a great idea. This is the best hybrid commercial ever! To bad they are not going to air it. It is sad that people are so scared of the myth that global warming caused by humans will destroy the world, instead of being scared of the real threat to the world, Radical Islam. 

HT Muqata

Posted in Israel, video | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

The Investigative Project on Terrorism: How The American Media And National Muslim Political Organization Support Terrorism, Murder And Genocide

Posted by avideditor on May 30, 2008

I just recieved this in my email. From the Investigative Project on Terrorism It is a must read.


When you don’t recognize evil, denounce evil, resist evil, fight evil, you become dangerously close to being evil.

That is the unfortunate situation where we find many important players in American society, including the mainstream media and the major national Muslim political groups. This does not bode well for America’s ability to fight and win the war against Islamo-fascist terrorism that now threatens the survival of the free world. That’s so because of the important role played by the mainstream media in shaping public opinion and public policy and because the essential role that the majority of Muslims must play in bringing the minority of the extremists within their ranks under control.

You don’t see much discussion of this in the mainstream media as those that control it simply do not see the evil of terrorism and Islamo-fascism, as they should and as any rational observer does.

This sorry state of affairs was made crystal clear in an article by Steven Emerson, one of the nation’s leading experts on international terrorism and national security. The article appears in the publication Counter Terrorism: The Journal of Counterterrorism and Homeland Security International (Summer 2008).

Read the rest of this entry »

Posted in America, Media Bias | Tagged: , , , , , | 3 Comments »

SCREW CAIR: Don’t change the term “The War on Terror” Mark Levin explains why terminology is important he says call it the war on Islamo-Nazis

Posted by avideditor on May 30, 2008

Mark Levin in his May 29th show talks about how it is import to use the term “The War on Terror” Mark Levin explains why terminology is important he says call the war on terrorism by its name. He explains how semantics is important and how they are trying have a war on words to destroy us. He also suggest to call it “the war on Islamo-Nazis”. He starts talking this 3 minutes into his great show. I totally agree with him.
He responds to the comments made by the Home Land Security worker Charles Allen. He talks about how CAIR is for the terrorist. He give the great remark “The more terrorist bastard we kill the better I feel.” He illustrates the point with more clarity then I have read else where. You can download it here. It is free. It is great. You should check it out. 

UPDATE: Mark Levin Fansite has more and a more direct link to the audio, which now bellow. 


During his commencement address to Air Force Academy graduates on Wednesday, President Bush made a fairly uncontroversial declaration. “The war on terror,” he said, “will dominate your military careers.”

But will it always have the same name? This morning in Financial Times, the Homeland Security Department’s top intelligence official became the latest prominent leader to say that the phrase should be dropped. “It is interpreted in the Muslim world as a war on Islam and we don’t need this,” Under Secretary Charles E. Allen said, adding that it spreads “animus” far beyond the enemy.

And dumber:

The global war on terror has become a thinly veiled excuse to wage a global war on Islam with increased arrests of Muslims, calls for regime change in Muslim countries and racial profiling, according to a leader with a national Islamic organization. “The tactic of terrorism—and yes it is a tactic, not an ideology—has been deployed by a multitude of groups of different religions, ethnicities and ideologies and yet the Islamic faith, unlike any other, is erroneously and incessantly associated with terrorism,” said Dr. Parvez Ahmed, a national board member of the Council on American Islamic Relations. “The association of a faith practiced by 1.2 billion people worldwide to terrorism creates the perception that the GWOT is a war against Islam.”

Here is Mark Levin tonight responding to the DHS’ Charles Allen, CAIR’s Parvez Ahmed, and all the fools whose “war over words” undermines our fight against the global jihadists:

Related: The Government’s Jihad on Jihad: Still lookin’ for love in all the wrong places

Posted in America, audio, Islam | Tagged: , , , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

Boycott MSNBC and Buy Dunkin’ Donuts: Olbermann is clueless and support what the Kaffiyeh stands for the genocide of the Jewish people

Posted by avideditor on May 29, 2008

Rachel Ray was clearly wearing a pro Jihadi scarf. Olmermann supports Hezbollah, Hamas, and other terrorist and he has the audacity to call people exposing Jihadist the most like them. Olbermann is full of lies. He is a terrorist supporter. Every time I see some one wearing a Kaffiyeh I ask them if they support terrorist. Every time they say they support the “Palistinian struggle” against Israel. If you don’t believe me ask the next person wearing a Kadifah yourself. Wearing that scarf means you support the “Palestinian” effort to kill all the jews. Dunkin’ Donuts did the right thing by pulling that ad. If Dunkin’ Donuts was kosher I would eat there every day. They did the right thing by standing up against the Jihadis attempt of genocide against Jews. May G-d bless Dunkin’ Donuts and everyone else that takes a stand against terrorism. Watch the terrorist loving Olbermann preach his lies and hate.
[redlasso id=”c11280eb-893a-4e0e-a1a2-d7e7d829f094″]

Click here to go to Dunkin’ Donuts buy something to support their good judgement.

Posted in America, Israel, Media Bias | Tagged: , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment »

Barack Obama Pastor Problem: Obama has another Racist Pastor Michael Pfleger

Posted by avideditor on May 29, 2008

You can judge someone by the company they keep. Barack Obama hangs around too many racist American Haters to not be one himself. 

I found this at Pat Dollard:

Hussein Distances Himself From Yet Another Clergyman

obamaandfriends.jpgFirst Hussein brought us the Rev. Wright “flip flop”


Here –
Hussein’s Other Spiritual Leader Video

and here

Black Priest Apologizes For Sliming Hillary

Hussein brings us the Fr. Pfleger contraversy…..

You can tell a LOT about a man by the company he keeps…..

No matter how much he tries to shove those skeleton’s back in his closet.

Now hes about to try to throw this one under the bus too? Yeah… Not gonna work.


CHICAGO – Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama said Thursday that he was “deeply disappointed” by a supporter’s sermon at his church that mocked Hillary Rodham Clinton. Read the rest of this entry »

Posted in Obama, video | Tagged: , , , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

U.S. Suspects Syria Has More Secret Nuclear Sites YET OLMERT WANTS TO GIVE THEM THE GOLAN

Posted by avideditor on May 29, 2008

Olmert is trying to trade the security of Israel for his own political survival. Even the US sees Syria has more secret nuclear sites. 

(IsraelNN.com) The Bush administration suspects Syria has at least three more nuclear sites in addition to the Al Kibar facility that Israel allegedly bombed last September, the Washington Post reported Thursday morning. Syria is negotiating with the International Atomic Energy Agency, which wants to conduct inspections in the country.
American Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) director Michael Hayden told the newspaper, “Do not assume that Al Kibar exhausted our knowledge of Syrian efforts with regard to nuclear weapons.”

Posted in Israel | Tagged: , , , , | Leave a Comment »


Posted by avideditor on May 29, 2008

I found this on Pat Dollard and I agree completely. It is time the american public wakes up and realizes what we are fighting for our survival. The jihadis want to establish an Islamic Caliphate world wide we need to realize that Jihadis are just as bad as Nazis. 

President Bush Compares Iraq, Afghan Wars To World War II


I have to agree….

Were in a fight for our freedom…

Same fight, different enemy….

All I have to ask is….

When can we drop 2 nukes on Tehran to end it for the win?

COLORADO SPRINGS, Colorado (CNN) — President Bush told the 2008 graduating class at the U.S. Air Force Academy on Wednesday that the “only way America could lose the war on terror is if we defeat ourselves.”

Speaking on a cloudy day at Falcon Stadium, the president compared the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan to America’s earlier conflicts, particularly World War II.

“Our nation is once again contending with an ideology that seeks to sow anger, hatred and despair: the ideology of Islamic extremism,” he said.

“In today’s struggle, we are once again facing evil men who despise freedom and despise America and aim to subject millions to their violent rule.

“We assumed this obligation before,” he said, referring to the rebuilding of Germany and Japan after World War II, a conflict that saw the loss of more than 400,000 American lives. Watch more of Bush’s speech »

“Germany and Japan, once mortal enemies, are now allies of the United States. And people across the world have reaped the benefits from that alliance,” he said. “Today, we must do the same in Afghanistan and Iraq. … We’ll lay the foundation of peace for generations to come.”

But today’s wars differ from those of the past, Bush acknowledged, and not only because of modern technology that allows “greater precision” in warfare.

One challenge is that in the past, in Germany and Japan, the work of rebuilding took place in relative quiet,” he said.

“Today, we’re helping emerging democracies rebuild under fire from terrorist networks and state sponsors of terror. This is a difficult and unprecedented task — and we’re learning as we go.”

The measure of success in war has changed, he said.

“In the past … there were public surrenders, a signing ceremony on the deck of a battleship, victory parades in American cities. Today, when the war continues after the regime has fallen, the definition of success is more complicated.”

Nonetheless, he said, in Iraq and Afghanistan, there is a clear definition of success: when those countries are rid of al Qaeda, when they are economically viable, when they are democracies that can govern effectively and when they are strong allies on the war on terror.

“These successes will come,” he told the class. “And when they do, our nation will have achieved victory, and the American people will be more secure.

Posted in America, Islam | Tagged: , , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

Plan your trip to the Flight 93 crash site for the weekend of August 2nd!

Posted by avideditor on May 28, 2008

Blogburst logo, petition

Are you thinking of visiting the Flight 93 crash site? If you plan your visit for the weekend of August 2nd, you can help stop the gigantic terrorist memorial mosque that will soon start rising from the ground there.

August 2nd is the next scheduled public meeting of the Memorial Project, where anyone can sign up to speak during the public comment period. Tom Burnett Sr. (whose son Tom Jr. broke into the cockpit of the hijacked airplane) announced last Friday that he and Alec Rawls will be traveling to Somerset for the August meeting. They will be rallying outdoors, speaking at the public meeting, and visiting the crash site.

Mr. Burnett is asking other concerned parties who can make it to please come. The crash site is a beautiful and meaningful place to visit in any case, and here is a chance to make your visit even more meaningful. It is an opportunity to in some small way follow the lead of the heroes of Flight 93 by helping to stop the re-hijacking of Flight 93.

Mr. Burnett’s announcement came on the Mancow Muller radio show, where Congressman Tancredo was also a guest. When controversy over the Crescent of Embrace design first arose back in 2005, Tom Tancredo was instrumental in forcing the Park Service to alter the design. Last fall he noted that the giant crescent remains unchanged in the so-called redesign and asked the Park Service to scrap the design entirely. On Friday he said that he would help Mancow Muller and Tom Burnett to stop the crescent design (audio, 19 seconds):

Certainly I will do everything I can to help you. I will bring it to the attention of my colleagues. I’ll use the time I have on the floor of the House to rail against it.


Mr. Burnett said that he would join Mancow in going to jail for taking sledgehammers to the crescent memorial if this tribute to the terrorists actually gets built. (Audio, 25 seconds.)

Cao has the whole segment of Mancow and the two Toms up as a YouTube video, with her own background graphics.

To join our blogbursts, just send your blog’s url.

Posted in America, Islam | Tagged: , , | Leave a Comment »

Jimmy Carter Disgraced For Many Reasons

Posted by avideditor on May 28, 2008

Here is a great article on Dhimmi Carter. Why do evil people live so long? 

Jimmy Carter Disgraced For Many Reasons

By Joel J. Sprayregen

When it came time to judge Jimmy Carter’s presidency, Americans voters thundered:  Carter, receiving 40% of the popular vote, carrying  six states. With sound reasons: The prime rate had soared to 20%, inflation to 12.5% and unemployment to 7.5% 
More dismal than Carter’s domestic failures is the continuing damage his blunders did to international security.  Carter would not help Iran’s Shah — a strong ally of the U.S., even if not exactly a Jeffersonian democrat — withstand Khomeini’s revolution.  Carter bears responsibility for subjecting Iran to the nightmarish rule of fanatic mullahs.  All evils currently instigated by Iran — e.g., killing U.S. soldiers in Iraq, Hezbollah’s subjugation of Lebanon, Hamas’ reign of rockets and terrorism–are  attributable to Carter’s blunder.  Carter urged 150 Iranian generals to accept Khomeini. All were subsequently tortured and executed; the mullahs distributed photos of their mutilated corpses.
Iranian theocrats exhibited their respect for Carter by invading our embassy in Teheran and kidnapping diplomats — a breach of international law eschewed even by Hitler and Stalin.  Carter dithered for 444 interminable days during the crisis.  His cowardly reluctance to take action exposed our country as a paper tiger, emboldening enemies worldwide.  Hostages were released the day Ronald Reagan became President; Iranians realized we now had a leader who would act resolutely.
No Credence Due Carter
This explains why no credence is due anything Carter says regarding public policy.  To these defects of intellect and character, one more must be added:  Carter’s obsession about Israel which borders on — and trespasses into — outright anti-Semitism.  You don’t have to be Jewish to recognize the mischief Carter caused in the Middle East last week by his parleys with senior Hamas terrorist Khaled Meshaal. Michael Young of the Beirut Star editorialized:  “Carter is on a fool’s errand, complicating an already complicated situation” because his meetings with Hamas legitimate terrorists who have no interest in peaceful resolution.
The columnist added:
“You can almost hear Meshaal gasping at Carter’s naiveté as he prepares to score points off his solemn American visitor.” 
The State Department and Congressmen from both parties condemned Carter’s interference with U.S. policy of shunning Hamas until it abandons its aim of annihilating Israel. Hamas, claiming Carter won them respectability, celebrated by sending two explosive-laden cars into Israel, followed by an armored car filled with murderers, plus knocking out a power line with a rocket barrage.
I suffered a one-on-one meeting with Carter during the 1976 primaries. Carter assured me that, as a devout Christian, he was committed to Israel’s security.  He handwrote a confirmation.  It was all lies. Carter reportedly told intimates that Sen. Henry Jackson had the Jewish voters “so we’ll get the Christians.”  In 1980, Carter ordered an unprecedented vote against Israel in the UN Security Council.  He subsequently put out the lie that our delegate misunderstood instructions!  As November neared and American Jews–like their Christian neighbors–indicated that they would back Reagan in unprecedented numbers, Carter told associates, “If I get back in, I’m going to ****  the Jews.”  And so he has been trying for 28 years.
Carter’s Discredited Book
Carter wrote a mendacious book about Israel, jamming the expletive “Apartheid” into his title to achieve maximum defamatory effect, though he knows Israeli Arabs enjoy equal rights unknown in other Mideast countries. 

Scholar Kenneth Stein, ex-director of the Carter Center, wrote  that Carter’s book was,

“replete with factual errors, copied materials not cited [including maps stolen from Dennis Ross’ book with captions switched], glaring omissions and simply invented segments.”  
Even the New York Times, deriding Carter’s “narrow perspective,” charged the book with lying about Arafat’s supposedly abandoning terrorism.  Arafat was Carter’s endeared friend despite his murders of U.S. diplomats in Khartoum [machine-gunned in 1973] and Gaza [blown up in 2003].  Carter, who placed flowers on Arafat’s grave last week, edited the unrepentant master terrorist’s speeches to maximize a false spin of peace-loving.

Professor Stein and 13 other senior advisers of the Carter Center — which underwrites Carter’s travels and writings — resigned in protest over the “Apartheid” book. 

Blood money
An editorial in Investor’s Business Daily,  captioned “Jimmy Carter’s L’il Ol’ Stink Tank,” revealed that the Center’s $200 million endowment derives from multi-million-dollar gifts from Saudi princes and government, oil sheikhs, crooked Mideast bankers and Arafat cronies:  
“Arab cash flows into the Center from people known to demand something in return.  The Center’s contributions and Carter’s anti-Israel diatribes have both increased dramatically.” 
Saudi Arabia — a country in which I observed flagrant human rights violations during visits in 1995 and 1998 — routinely beheads prisoners (102 in the first half of 2007, including 3 women), chops off limbs, sentences rape victims to lashings and forbids women to drive. Carter has never criticized Saudi Arabia. Apparently, Saudi money speaks loudly to him.  Carter reserves his criticism for American Jews who make contributions to candidates they favor.
While Carter castigates Israeli leaders, including those responsible for withdrawing from Gaza, he has showered praise on dictators, including the Father-Son Dr. Strangeloves of North Korea (who let millions of their own citizens starve to death),  Hafez al-Assad (who slaughtered 20,000 of his own citizens at a place called Hama), Fidel Castro, Hugo Chavez, Robert Mugabe, Hosni Mubarak, Tito and Ceausescu (asserting the latter two believed in “human rights”)  Democratic Party leaders are scrambling to distance Carter from their Convention and the presidential election; Americans disagree on many issues, but there is no strong pro-Hamas faction in this country.
Former Mayor Ed Koch wrote last week that Jimmy Carter was “a miserable president” and “a miserable human being now as he prepares to meet with Hamas.”  Carter should be encouraged to farm his peanuts, build houses and take more money from the Saudis.  For the sake of the security of democratic countries, he should be discouraged from meddling in foreign policy.
Joel Sprayregen, a Chicago lawyer, met Jimmy Carter twice but voted for him only once.  He was an invited guest at Carter’s Presidential Inauguration. 

Posted in America | Tagged: , , , , , | 3 Comments »

Mark Levin links Obama way of thinking with Hitlers

Posted by avideditor on May 28, 2008

One of the best 30 minutes in Radio I have ever heard is Mark Levin linking Obama’s ideas to Stalin and Hitler. Check it out. It is the may 27th show. I am thinking about transcribing it if I have the time. You have around a week to download it for free. I am going to see if I can get someone to post the audio some place else. 

UPDATE: Velvet Hammer Posted the Audio on her site with a transcript of Obama’s speech

Posted in America, audio, Obama | Tagged: , , , , , , | 3 Comments »

Obama Adviser Brzezinski Says Jewish Lobby Practices McCarthyism: More evidence of Obama’s hatred of the Jews

Posted by avideditor on May 27, 2008

Here is more evidence that Obama hates the Jews. We need to prevent this anti semite from bamboozling the American people into electing him.  I found this story at Yid With A Lid


Brzezinski is someone I have learned an immense amount from”, and “one of our most outstanding scholars and thinkers–Senator Barack Obama

The march of of Senator Obama’s Anti-Jew crew continues:

A foreign policy expert consulted by presidential hopeful Barack Obama has accused members of the American Jewish establishment of “McCarthyism” in its attitude towards critics of Israel. Former national security adviser Zbigniew Brzezinski says that the pro-Israel lobby in the US is too powerful, while the slur of anti-Semitism is too readily used whenever its power is called into question.

Presenting a solution for the Middle East, he listed historical compromises that had to be made by Israelis and Palestinians but accused the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) — the largest and most influential lobby group — of obstructing peace efforts. He said: “AIPAC has consistently opposed a two-state solution and a lot of members of Congress have been intimidated and I don’t think that’s healthy.” Source

It is interesting that Obama adviser Zbigniew Brzezinski, is using anti-Jewish stereotypes to make his point. What he doesn’t realize is that Jews welcome criticism (it helps us with our daily ration of guilt). What we don’t welcome are the stupid stereotypes which bigots like Brzezinski use. That secret cabal of the Jewish lobby making all of the US foreign policy decisions. There is no Jewish lobby, believe me if there was my wife would have it painted. 

Brzezinski even lied about the real facts. AIPAC does support the two state solution, it may not agree with the Israeli government on everything but there is a list of Pro-two state solution documents on its website. 

Zbigniew Brzezinski, as you may remember, was part of the Jimmy Carter administration (no surprise). And is a foreign policy adviser to Barack Obama. Folks Do I see a trend in Obama advisers, or is this one of those guilt by association things? Senator, tell me again how you support Israel, I love tall tales.

Posted in Obama | Tagged: , , , , , , , , | 4 Comments »

Great News Even Israel’s Left sees appeasing the “Palestinians” doesn’t work

Posted by avideditor on May 27, 2008

This is some great news from Israel from Israel Matzav.

Even the left is getting tired of the ‘Palestinians.’

Anyone who has read this blog for any period of time has seen me refer to Haaretz as Israel’s ‘Hebrew ‘Palestinian’ Daily‘ (a term which was not coined by me, but by Steven Plaut). Bradley Burston is one of Haaretz’s most left-wing writers. But look what he’s telling the ‘Palestinians’ now.

We in the post-modern West have spent years educating ourselves to believe that all cultures are equally valid – with the possible exception, of course, of our own. We have taken it on faith that to criticize the culture of an indigenous people is obscenely imperialist, paternalist.

Read the rest here

Posted in Israel | Tagged: , , | Leave a Comment »

Obama and the Jews: Don’t buy into Obama’s Lies

Posted by avideditor on May 27, 2008

Obama is now trying to hid his true identity and lie to jewish voters in an attempt to decieve them. 10 year ago he was at a dinner with a radical “Palestinian” group which called for the destruction of the state of Israel. 

Sultan Knish presents a great piece on this topic. I wish I could write as well as him. But since I can not enjoy his great work. 


Obama and the Jews

The part time occupation of the part time Jews in the major media outlets for the last week or so has been to tackle Obama’s Jewish problem head on, in the same way that major corporations tackle the public revelation their product is fatally toxic to babies– by shaking their heads, smiling weakly and assuring us that it’s all in our heads. 

If we’re to believe the New York Times, the Washington Post and the rest of the good people at Media Central, the whole Jewish problem with Obama is the result of some provocative emails sent out by Karl Rove in his spare time that unfairly paint Obama as a Muslim to some gullible senior citizens.

“There, there,” the media assures these elders, “Obama isn’t a Muslim. He’s the Messiah come to lead us to the promised land of big government, Cuban quality health care and environmental taxes on every ounce of bread we eat.” And on the way there he may stop by the Middle East to lead Hamas to Jerusalem.

“Hasn’t Obama said that he’s Pro-Israel,” the columnists bewails, “how many times does he need to say it.” They don’t stay to hear the reply that he doesn’t need to say it, he needs to be it. For a skeptical profession they seem oddly offended that anyone is taking a politician’s statements in an election year with a grain of salt. “Listen to the man,” they say, “pay no attention to the Zbigniew Brzezinski, George Soros, Tony Lake, Samantha Power and Robert O. Malley behind the curtain.”

Hasn’t Obama already fired Samantha Power who wanted an invasion of Israel and Robert O’ Malley who was already privately meeting with Hamas, they protest. That just leaves George Soros without whom Obama would be just another junior Senator angling for an entry level spot on a committee, Brzezinski who helped bring Iran and Al Queda into existence and the rest of Obama’s radicals, both from his Chicago Wright days and his Harvard period, who are all too full of thoughts on what should be done with America and Israel.

The media which until recently was doing its best to pretend that the only people who could possibly oppose Obama were Satanists or worse yet Christians, has decided to believe that the only Democrats who oppose Obama are the senile elderly, hysterical feminists or rednecks. And the media is sure that once Obama is officially anointed at the convention, they along with the Jews will learn to fall into line behind the Kossacks, just like their ancestors did in Eastern Europe. If not, there’s always a cavalry charge.

While the leaders of major Jewish organizations are being called on the carpet by the Democratic leadership and told that they will lose influence and face a major backlash and the destruction of the “Black-Jewish alliance” if they don’t get behind Obama right now and leap into action to reassure their communities that Obama is A-OK; the Jewish public’s concerns are being poo-poohed by the press which is certain those ignorant folks in Brooklyn and Miami Beach will follow marching orders at the polls as soon as their own leadership does. For now some of the Jewish organizations are holding out for assurances that will no doubt fall away once Obama stops by for a meet and greet over bagels and lox and assures them how much he enjoyed Fiddler on the Roof.

As the ultimate outsider who belongs nowhere Obama has shown a great talent for repackaging himself into a dozen ethnic and racial identities. Obama can be white or black. He can be Christian or Muslim. He can be a wealthy Harvard educated professional or a street level community activist. Like an MC Escher picture, he’s a collection of impossibly intersecting levels that seem oddly out of perspective for reasons that aren’t apparent until you try to follow his contradictions. With all that in mind, there’s no reason that Obama can’t also repackage himself as a Jew.

To that end, Obama is already reimagining himself as a Zionist thanks to a Jewish sixth grade camp counselor and speaking of his love for the writings of Leon Uris and Philip Roth. While it’s safe to assume that Obama won’t be giving any readings of Leon Uris’ The Haj, a book that captured with unnerving accuracy the psychological fault lines of Arab culture, he is displaying a talent more worthy of the literary works of other writers such as F. Scott Fitzgerald or Theodore Dreiser. The talent of recreating himself into what people most want to see, the gift of the true con artist.

Obama hasn’t begun name dropping Uris and Roth out of a sudden love for old Jewish writers. Instead he’s discovered a sudden love of the same things that elderly and middle aged Jewish voters who have jilted him are interested in. Like the cynical suitor who studies a girl’s habits to discover her tastes and mirrors them to seduce her, Obama has made it his practice to jump in and out of identities and personas. Today Obama is reading Leon Uris. Tomorrow there’s a rally in San Francisco and he’s reading Amy Tan. The day after that he will be connecting to Feminists by namedropping some Erica Jong. Which selection in the infinitely expandable Obama Book Club best reflects who he is? The answer is none of them. The only thing that reflects on Obama is that he is determined to be President and willing to say anything to make it happen.

Jewish voters are nothing more to him than another breed of cattle to be coaxed through the gates of the polling centers to vote for him. The Democratic party relies on a varied and diverse herd led by Judas Goat community leaders to win office and they’re good at managing the herd. Stop by for a pizza in Little Italy, a bagel on the Lower East Side, some won ton in Chinatown and a burger in Harlem. Shake everyone’s hand, smile, relate and then slip some assurances and earmarks under the table to the community leaders. The herd sighs. The herd is happy as they led back to the barn until the next milking or slaughter.

In making the choice to break with Obama. Jewish voters are being given the chance to allow a larger moral reckoning to win out over this cheap type of ethnic pandering that the Obama campaign is engaging in. It is not guilt that should motivate Jewish voters to reject Obama. There will be plenty time for guilt after 8 years of Obama have done their damage just as there was after 1946. Guilt is the luxury of those who made an unforgivable mistake. This is the year when we can prevent the mistake from being made. Guilt is the refuge of those who know that what they are doing is wrong but refuse to change. This is the year when we can change.

Obama is not our savior. Obama is no one’s savior but his own. As his cult of personality spreads, millions of Americans are throwing reason and rationality out the window to embrace the promise of a one man solution to all their problems. But Obama’s background has left him with two poisoned outsider’s gifts, a legacy of hatred for America and the ability to camouflage his real feelings to blend in anywhere.

When a nation brings a cult of personality leader to power, it is typically at a low point in its national self-confidence and finds an outsider to rule over them in the hope he will save them from themselves. Just as Hitler was an Austrian ruling over Germany, Stalin was an Ossetian ruling over Russia, Obama is an African Arab with a Muslim background positioning himself for the White House. With a slim record and a campaign built primarily around his outgoing personality, Obama is America’s biggest mistake waiting to be made. Let’s not play any part in making it.

We don’t need to be saved from ourselves. We need to be saved from leaders who think that we rather than they are the problem. We need to be saved from leaders who imagine that disarming America and destroying Israel will make our enemies love us. We need to be saved from leaders who have more empathy for the enemy than they do for the citizens they rule over.

We don’t need to be saved by a lifelong con artist with a manufactured biography who repackages himself to appeal to everyone while concealing his real sympathies behind a facade of multilevel marketing outreach. We need to be saved from him and only we can save ourselves from him.

Posted in Obama | Tagged: , , , , | 4 Comments »


Posted by avideditor on May 27, 2008

I think Barack Obama shares the same views on foreign policy as his preacher. Obama as president would not only destroy America but it will destroy the world. The only reason radical jihadi islamist are running Iran is due to Carter. I think Obama is much worse than Carter. 

HT Pat Dollard


Stupid, stupid Hussein……

Stockton Record

By Charles Krauthammer
Washington Post Writers Group

When the House of Representatives takes up arms against $4 gas by voting 324-84 to sue OPEC, you know that election-year discourse has gone surreal. Another unmistakable sign is when a presidential candidate makes a gaffe, then, realizing it is too egregious to take back without suffering humiliation, decides to make it a centerpiece of his foreign policy.

Before the Democratic debate of July 23, Barack Obama had never expounded upon the wisdom of meeting, without precondition, with Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, Bashar al-Assad, Hugo Chavez, Kim Jong Il or the Castro brothers. But in that debate, he was asked about doing exactly that.

Unprepared, he said sure – then got fancy, declaring the Bush administration’s refusal to do so not just “ridiculous” but “a disgrace.”

After that, there was no going back. So he doubled down. What started as a gaffe became policy. By now, it has become doctrine. Yet it remains today what it was on the day he blurted it out: an absurdity.

Should the president ever meet with enemies? Sometimes, but only after minimal American objectives – i.e. preconditions – have been met. The Shanghai communique was largely written long before Richard Nixon ever touched down in China. Yet Obama thinks Nixon to China confirms the wisdom of his willingness to undertake a worldwide freshman-year tyrants tour.

Most of the time you don’t negotiate with enemy leaders because there is nothing to negotiate. Does Obama imagine that North Korea, Iran, Syria, Cuba and Venezuela are insufficiently informed about American requirements for improved relations?

There are always contacts through back channels or intermediaries.

Iran, for example, has engaged in five years of talks with our closest European allies and the International Atomic Energy Agency, to say nothing of the hundreds of official U.S. statements outlining exactly what we would give them in return for suspending uranium enrichment.

Obama pretends that while he is for such “engagement,” the cowboy Republicans oppose it. Another absurdity. No one is debating the need for contacts. The debate is over the stupidity of elevating rogue states and their tyrants, easing their isolation and increasing their leverage by granting them unconditional meetings with the president of the world’s superpower.

Obama cited Franklin Roosevelt and Harry Truman as presidents who met with enemies. Does he know no history? Neither Roosevelt nor Truman ever met with any of the leaders of the Axis powers. Obama must be referring to the pictures he’s seen of Roosevelt and Stalin at Yalta, and Truman and Stalin at Potsdam. Does he not know that at that time Stalin was a wartime ally?

During the subsequent Cold War, Truman never met with Stalin. Nor Mao. Nor Kim Il Sung. Truman was no fool.

Obama cites John Kennedy meeting Nikita Khrushchev as another example of what he wants to emulate. Really? That Vienna summit of a young, inexperienced, untested American president was disastrous, emboldening Khrushchev to push Kennedy on Berlin – and then near fatally in Cuba, leading almost directly to the Cuban missile crisis. Is that the precedent Obama aspires to follow?

A meeting with Ahmadinejad would not just strengthen and vindicate him at home, it would instantly and powerfully ease the mullahs’ isolation, inviting other world leaders to follow. And with that would come a flood of commercial contracts, oil deals, diplomatic agreements – undermining precisely the very sanctions and isolation that Obama says he would employ against Iran.

As every seasoned diplomat knows, the danger of a summit is that it creates enormous pressure for results. And results require mutual concessions. That is why conditions and concessions are worked out in advance, not on the scene.

What concessions does Obama imagine Ahmadinejad will make to him on Iran’s nuclear program? And what new concessions will Obama offer? To abandon Lebanon? To recognize Hamas? Or perhaps to squeeze Israel?

Having lashed himself to the ridiculous, unprecedented promise of unconditional presidential negotiations – and then having compounded the problem by elevating it to a principle – Obama keeps trying to explain. Recently, he declared in Pendleton, Ore., that by Soviet standards Iran and others “don’t pose a serious threat to us.” (On the contrary. Islamic Iran is dangerously apocalyptic. Soviet Russia was not.) The next day in Billings, Mont.: “I’ve made it clear for years that the threat from Iran is grave.”

That’s the very next day, mind you. Such rhetorical flailing has done more than create an intellectual mess. It has given rise to a new political phenomenon: the metastatic gaffe. The one begets another, begets another, begets …

Posted in Obama | Tagged: , , , , | 1 Comment »

Carter Says EU Is Colluding In A Human Rights Crime: Dhimmi Carter thinks it is a human right for the jihadis to kill jews

Posted by avideditor on May 27, 2008

Super dhimmi Carter thinks it is the jihadi human right to kill jews. I think it is all the oil money he is receiving. Will some one please do something to shut this terrorist loving mad man up. He should be tried for treason. 

HT Pat Dollard


The Guardian – Monday May 26 2008 Article history

Britain and other European governments should break from the US over the international embargo on Gaza, former US president Jimmy Carter told the Guardian yesterday. Carter, visiting the Welsh border town of Hay for the Guardian literary festival, described the EU’s position on the Israeli-Palestinian dispute as “supine” and its failure to criticise the Israeli blockade of Gaza as “embarrassing”.

Referring to the possibility of Europe breaking with the US in an interview with the Guardian, he said: “Why not? They’re not our vassals. They occupy an equal position with the US.”

The blockade on Hamas-ruled Gaza, imposed by the US, EU, UN and Russia – the so-called Quartet – after the organisation’s election victory in 2006, was “one of the greatest human rights crimes on Earth,” since it meant the “imprisonment of 1.6 million people, 1 million of whom are refugees”. “Most families in Gaza are eating only one meal per day. To see Europeans going along with this is embarrassing,” Carter said.

He called on the EU to reassess its stance if Hamas agreed to a ceasefire in Gaza. “Let the Europeans lift the embargo and say we will protect the rights of Palestinians in Gaza, and even send observers to Rafah gate [Gaza’s crossing into Egypt] to ensure the Palestinians don’t violate it.”

Although it is 27 years since he left the White House, Carter recently met Hamas leaders in Damascus. He declared a breakthrough in persuading the organisation to offer a Gaza ceasefire and a halt to Palestinian rocket attacks on Israel if Israel stopped its air and ground strikes on the territory.

Carter described western governments’ self-imposed ban on talking to Hamas as unrealistic and said everyone knew Israel was negotiating with the organisation through an Egyptian mediator, Omar Suleiman. Suleiman took the Hamas ceasefire offer to Jerusalem last week.

Israel was still hesitating over the ceasefire, Carter confirmed yesterday. “I talked to Mr Suleiman the day before yesterday. I hope the Israelis will accept,” he said.

While being scrupulously polite to the Palestinian Authority president, Mahmoud Abbas, and prime minister, Salam Fayyad, who represent the Fatah movement, he was scathing about their exclusion of Hamas. He described the Fatah-only government as a “subterfuge” aimed at getting round Hamas’s election victory two years ago. “The top opinion pollster in Ramallah told me the other day that opinion on the West Bank is shifting to Hamas, because people believe Fatah has sold out to Israel and the US,” he said.

Carter said the Quartet’s policy of not talking to Hamas unless it recognised Israel and fulfilled two other conditions had been drafted by Elliot Abrams, an official in the national security council at the White House. He called Abrams “a very militant supporter of Israel”. The ex-president, whose election-monitoring Carter Centre had just certified Hamas’s election victory as free and fair, addressed the Quartet for 12 minutes at its session in London in 2006. He urged it to talk to Hamas, which had offered to form a unity government with Fatah, the losers.

“The Quartet’s final document had been drafted in Washington in advance, and not a line was changed,” he said.

Earlier, Carter, told Sky News that Hillary Clinton should abandon her battle to become Democratic presidential candidate after the last round of primaries in early June. Like many superdelegates, he has yet to declare his support for either Clinton or Barack Obama, but he suggested the outcome of the race was a foregone conclusion. “I think that a lot of us superdelegates will make a decision … quite rapidly, after the final primary on June 3,” he said. “I think at that point it will be time for her to give it up.”

Last night, before a packed crowd at Hay, Carter spoke of his “horror” at America’s involvement in torturing prisoners, saying he wanted the next US president to promise never to do so again.

He left an intriguing hint that George Bush might even face prosecution on war crimes charges once he left office.

When pressed by Philippe Sands QC on Bush’s recent admission that he had authorised interrogation procedures widely seen as amounting to torture, Carter replied that he was sure Bush would be able to live a peaceful, “productive life – in our country”.

Sands, an international legal expert, said afterwards that he understood that to be “clear confirmation” that while Bush would face no challenge in his own country, “what happened outside the country was another matter entirely”.

Posted in America, Israel | Tagged: , , , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

Don’t bring you Daughters or Sisters to England: Dhimmi Police are allowing muslims kidnap and sell young white girls Londonstain is out of control

Posted by avideditor on May 26, 2008

It looks like England gave up. They are allowing Jihadis to kidnap and sell non muslims. I found this news on Atlas Shurgs


A Muslim leader has accused the police of failing to tackle Muslim  gangs suspected of prostituting young white girls. The Brits are living dhimmitude. The citizenry is without protection. Free falling into the abyss.

Muslim leader accuses police of being ‘over cautious’ in stopping Asian gangs pimping white girls Daily Mail hat tip Liam

Officers are accused of being “over cautious” when investigating Muslim criminals because they fear being branded racist.

Last night Mohammed Shafiq, director of the Ramadhan Foundation, said the police were differentiating between criminals on the basis of race.

He claimed, driven by fear of race riots in places like Blackburn and Oldham, officers were “overtly sensitive” and not clamping down on the sordid practice.

His controversial comments in this week’s Panorama reignite a massively controversial issue which exploded over a Channel 4 documentary in 2004.

That programme which claimed Asian men in Bradford were grooming under age white girls for prostitution was pulled from C4’s schedules.

This was because police claimed at the time that it could provoke racial violence during the local election campaign.

Now the BBC is to risk the wrath of police officials and campaigners by airing a programme which will look at the same issue.

Speaking as part of the Panorama investigation, which airs tomorrow (Thursday), Shafiq said: “I think the police are overcautious on dealing with this issue openly because they fear being branded racist and I think that is wrong.”

“These are criminals they should be treated as criminals. They are not Asian criminals, they are not Muslim criminals, they are not white criminals. They are criminals and they should be treated as criminals.”

He said that some of the criminals were Asian gangs looking to supplement their income, after the cost of drugs has fallen over the last few years.

Shafiq said “I am the only Muslim leader in the UK that speaks up against this sort of thing and I do it because these teenage girls are somebody’s sisters and they are somebody’s daughters. I have got two daughters and I wouldn’t want that to happen to my daughters.

“If there is a drug dealer grooming a white teenager into prostitution then I don’t want the police service or local authority not to be open about it.”

Philip Davies, MP for Shipley, also raised concerns about the issue yesterday.

He said: “Everybody is affected by political correctness. The reason why it is so important is because things like this.

“Young girls are having their lives threatened and ruined because people pussyfoot around and they are too scared to do anything in case they make a mistake and are accused of racism.

“That’s why we have to tackle the culture of political correctness everybody is affected by and I think the police are probably more affected and hamstrung by it than most organisations.”

His comments come as Professor David Barrett of University of Bedfordshire also raised deep concerns about the issue in the BBC1 programme.

He claimed evidence suggested that those operating the practice were “absolutely” likely to get away with it.

The programme will controversially reveal the ethnic pattern of the crime which is largely Asian in northern England, Afro-Caribbean in the West Midlands and elsewhere white, Turkish and Kurdish.

The Government, reacting to concerns, has revealed it will introduce new crime-fighting targets aimed at specifically combating the little-publicised problem.

But there are concerns that the practice, mostly operated by drug dealing gangs, has been of little priority to the various authorities.

Figures suggest there are in the region of 5,000 British children being used as prostitutes.

On the programme Vernon Coaker under secretary of state with responsibility for policing reveals the new measures will be come into force next month.

The government also plans to introduce a new warning video for use in schools over the issue.

But despite funding a Home Office study almost ten years ago which revealed how the problem can be tackled, the police has a low prosecution rate.

Coaker told Panorama that using powers under the Sexual Offences Act 2003 there have been just 44 convictions for grooming and pimping young children.

Police attempts are said to be frustrated by a code of silence.

Posted in Eurabia, Islam | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , | 5 Comments »

The first steps of removing Jihadis from Europe is a success Oriana Fallaci Parc is born

Posted by avideditor on May 26, 2008

Update: For those in shock read this: Islam is not a religion nor is it a cult. It is a complete system.

It is a great sign that liberal europe is rejecting the jihadis and there institutions of brain washing. I also enjoy the name they are naming the Park, Oriana Fallaci. I hope this is the start of a new trend. I now see Europe as having a chance of not becoming Eurabia. I found this on Sons of Apes and pigs. 

ViVa Italia: The first demolished mosque in Italy, to be “The Oriana Fallaci Parc”

The writing is on the wall, and the bulldozers are out.

Muslim Organizations, their media, their apologists, their fifth columnists, and their dogs are mourning, while looking for revenge, to perfidiously strike back, by using all the tricks of subversions to spread their venom that is always ready at the tip of their tongue.

They started already, with the announcement of this great news, for us, with their trademark of deception, by claiming that the responsibility for that terrorists nest (mosque) cleanup was done by the Italian Rightist party. But let no one swallow the bait and slip into their sewer trap.

The cleanup of those Jihadists infection was done by the government of the Republic of Italy elected lawfully to implement the will of the Italian people. Full stop. Our Civilized laws are not fabricated by Mullahs, Ayatollahs, Hezbollah, or cooked in El Doha -Qatar, under the guardianship of a seventh century turban head, with the patronage of a thug in chief, and an assassin in chief as they did to Lebanon.  

Having said this, I invite all the anti-jihadists sites reporting this news, not to be distracted by the devout deceivers and their use of divisive terminology. It’s nothing new for them. They’re the same people that goes to the Christians telling them, “How you deal with the Jews that killed your Jesus,” and then turn around to tell the Jews, “How can you deal with the Christians that massacred you.” Same old tricks, now they play the rightists – leftists divide, but let them swallow their saliva. The fact is, the Italian people have spoken.  

For 1400 years, muslims made it a habit to destroy, burn, and loot Churches and Synagogues in every country they attacked to steal, that’s how they want to finish up with Israel as well. The ones they couldn’t destroy, they simply turned to mosques. Hagia Sophia, and the Ummayyad mosque in Damascus, just to name two landmark Churches that are still standing today to condemn the religion of thieves and robbers. But they still dare to tell us with a straight face that theirs is the religion that respect and love all other religions. We know their love slogan, “love them, to rob them.”

This is the most posthumous honor to vindicate Oriana Fallaci that was sued visciously on several occasions by muslims before her death. And a sweet revenge for the great lady that sounded the alarm till her last noble breath, of the death that always comes with islam.  As another great lady said it, the fight is not against islamofascism, fundamental islam, political islam, B.S. islam, it’s islam. Mosques, the spearheads acting as the predatory takeover by muslims to conquer and change the European landscape, aiming to erase every symbol of the Judeo – Christian civilization from our cities and even our neighbourhoods.

I can’t help but salute the struggle of another great lady, Brigitte Bardot, for having the courage to speak up against the islamization plague in France.

Last but not least, a very big Viva l’Italia, and a biiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiig hug to all the the true Italians, without whom this could’ve not been possible. Keep up the good work,  and never forget that you’re the sons and daughters, of the great Garibaldi, and the least you should do is to send whoever called you, “the sons of apes and pigs,” to the garbage where they belong.

One thing for sure, Italians meant business when they went to the polls to elect their new government. And certainly this will be the first salvo to celebrate the crack of the temple of allah, and show the rest of the European populations that the road to follow for the destruction of allah’s terrorist cells, and give back Europe to its people, are in their ballot boxes. We have no doubt, the spirit of Oriana Fallaci, the great European symbol of courage and freedom, will also guide them on the way. The legacy of truth always lives forever.

Today Verona is not just a name of a great Italian city, but a symbol that could be synonymous with the Gates of Vienna.

Only one thing is missing, the mosque rubbles’ screen savers, But there is more to come.  

Read the rest at Sons Of Apes and Pigs

Posted in Eurabia, Islam | Tagged: , , , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

Barack Obama Continues to Blame America First

Posted by avideditor on May 26, 2008

It looks like Barack Obama hates America because he is blaming America on all the worlds problems. I fear that Obama would be worse for America than Jimmy Carter.  

I found this on GateWay Pundit. To read my previous post on Obama click here

The more you get to know Barack Obama, the more you get to know that he is just another typical Leftist who blames America first for all of the world’s problems.

It’s not the fault of Hamas terrorists, or the Iranian regime, or Marxist Hugo Chavez. It’s is the fault of George Bush and America that these extremists have kept their word and continued their extremist agenda.

Barack Obama on the dangerous Islamic regime in control of Iran:

“[Bush and Republican nominee John McCain have] got to answer for the fact that Iran is the greatest strategic beneficiary of our invasion of Iraq. It made Iran stronger, George Bush’s policies,” he said.

Barack Obama on the dangerous Islamic terrorists in control of Gaza:

“He blamed Bush’s policies for enhancing the strength of terrorist groups such as Hamas…”

Barack Obama on the radical Marxist in control of Venezuela:

Since the Bush Administration launched a misguided war in Iraq, its policy in the Americas has been negligent toward our friends, ineffective with our adversaries, disinterested in the challenges that matter in peoples’ lives, and incapable of advancing our interests in the region.

No wonder, then, that demagogues like Hugo Chavez have stepped into this vacuum.

(Barack Obama says this as he continues to attack America’s staunch ally in South America, Colombia.) 

Barack Obama is looking more and more like the last America hater who sat in the White House.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged: , , , , , | 1 Comment »

Some great Audio For Memorial Day

Posted by avideditor on May 26, 2008

I think Dennis Prager did an amazing show this memorial day. You can listen to the whole thing online commercial free. Here   I think he captured the existential meaning of what this day means better than I can write it. I highly recommend you check it out. Enjoy. 


Posted in audio | Tagged: , , , | 1 Comment »

%d bloggers like this: