Avid Editor's Insights

Australian Moonbat Lawyer Raves and Equates Jihadis with Jews

Posted by avideditor on February 28, 2008

I think a friend of mine had the best response to the Lawyer equating Jihadis to Jews:”Those who point to the Torah and say it involves violent destruction of cities obviously doesnt understand what the Torah says. The only land the Jewish people must occupy is Israel. There is no command to destroy infidels or to rise up against non-Jewish nations. Those who think otherwise need to re-read what the Torah says. It is obvious this lawyer is a nut-case and is only twisting the words of Torah to suit his twisted world view.”

Australian Moonbat Lawyer Raves:”The United States isn’t the only country plagued with delusional moonbat attorneys: Jury asked to consider ‘America’s evil’.


THE jury in Australia’s largest terrorism case has been asked to consider the ‘evil’ America has done, as a court judges 12 Melbourne men accused of plotting to commit ‘violent jihad’.Opening the defence case today, lawyer Remy van de Wiel, QC, told the jury America had suffered an enormous blow to its pride as a result of the September 11 World Trade Center attack. Mr Van de Wiel described the attacks as ‘evil and shocking’.‘But don’t forget, America has done many evil things too,’ Mr van de Wiel told the court.He also told the Victorian Supreme Court jury to be cautious about forming the opinion that Osama bin Laden, who it has heard was a hero to the leader of the Melbourne group, was responsible for the 9/11 attacks.‘To say this was all orchestrated by Osama bin Laden is also very silly,’ he said. ‘He has never claimed responsibility.’Mr Van de Wiel, who is representing Abdul Nacer Benbrika, the alleged leader of the group, also told the jury similarities existed between the teachings of the Bible and the Koran. He pointed to sections of the Bible which detailed the ‘fanatical destruction of whole cities’ and spoke of a ‘fanatical, vengeful God’.(Via Little Green Footballs.)


One Response to “Australian Moonbat Lawyer Raves and Equates Jihadis with Jews”

  1. LC-EFA said

    None of that BS should be even admissible in the court.

    The law-snake is making excuses for his client’s behavior (or rather trying to justify it) when he should be attempting to prove that he’s innocent of what he’s charged with.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: