The union thugs support the Muslim Brotherhood and other Jihadi groups that rebelled in the middle east to create the Caliphate. They lost big tonight. Just like the USSR the commie jihadi thugs are doomed to fail and will continue to.
When Israelis express concern about what’s going on in Egypt, we’re told that this “isn’t about Israel” and that it “isn’t about the Jews.” We’re told not to worry about the Muslim Brotherhood coming out on top of a new Egypt, because they’ve ‘moderated’ and have become ‘practical’ and won’t hijack this revolution the way Khomeni hijacked Iran’s revolution 30 years ago. We’re told that Egypt won’t abrogate its treaty with us, won’t stop selling us natural gas, and will continue to cooperate with us in fighting arms smuggling on Egypt’s border with Gaza. All of this – we are told – should make us change our tune about what’s going on in Egypt. Just ask William Hague.
All of that ignores the reality of what’s going on in Tahrir Square in Cairo. Take – for instance – the image above. It’s an image published by Reuters. It’s Hosni Mubarak being hung in effigy in Tahrir Square. It’s an image that’s appeared in the mainstream media from all over the world. But until now, the effigy was only seen from a distance. This photo is from much closer up. Look at Mubarak’s tie. What do you see on it? Yes, of course, that’s a Magen David (Star of David), which is a clear Jewish symbol.
The above photo and the second photo in the preceding series were both found on an English-language pro-protester/anti-Mubarak discussion forum named the Hashem Studios Board. The thread from which they are taken is titled “The Egyptian Revolution.” The thread is replete with anti-Israeli vitriol.
Such vitriol includes comments like “Israel after we are done with Mubarak, we will come for you!!!” In response to the sarcastic question “Whats a pro mubarak protester?,”another commentator replies, “Yeah good question, does he look like this….,” and posts the following cartoon.
Obviously, that’s meant to be Avigdor Lieberman and not Mubarak.
John has combed through images from the Egyptian protests and has found a lot more that will make your blood curdle. The Western news media has apparently been ‘sparing’ us.
Saboteurs blew up a pipeline that runs through Egypt’s North Sinai and supplies gas to Israel, state television reported on Saturday, although it was not immediately clear what impact the blast had on gas flows.
“Saboteurs took advantage of the security situation and blew up the gas pipeline,” a state television correspondent reported, saying there was a big explosion. He also blamed the blast on “terrorists”.
Residents in the area also reported a huge explosion and said flames were raging in an area near the pipeline in the El-Arish area of north Sinai
Caliphate. A word that most Americans probably have notnever heard.
A word that is not in the digital version of the Oxford-English dictionary.
A word and a concept that until this week was relatively obscure and then FOX TV‘s Glenn Beck decided to explain the word and it’s meaning to his sizable audience.
And so Beck’s chalkboards were used to explain the meaning of Caliphate. But as he always does, Mr. Beck challenged his audience to do their own homework and investigate all of the information he delivers on his nightly program. Google recorded so many searches for “caliphate” and “caliphate definition” that both cracked the top five in Google trends.
But for the three decades of Hosni Mubarak’s reign the U.N. has dedicated its human rights apparatus to demonizing the state of Israel and ignoring the human rights victims in Egypt and across the Arab world. As dissatisfaction and unrest have grown in the region over his presidency, the Obama administration failed to recognize the U.N.’s gross negligence or to take responsibility for ensuring an alternative vehicle to promote democracy. Instead, it legitimized the U.N.’s top human rights body, the Human Rights Council (HRC), by joining it.
Notwithstanding the meltdown in Egypt, Esther Brimmer, Assistant Secretary of State for the Bureau of International Organization Affairs picked Tuesday to give her evidence for the success of the Obama foreign policy of engagement with the U.N. and its human rights world.
Additionally, 82% support stoning adulterers and 54% say suicide bombings can be justified.
(Washington Examiner)- Last year the Pew Research Center Global Attitudes Project conducted a survey of opinion in several Muslim countries. The subject was the proper role of Islam in politics and society. One of the countries surveyed was Egypt, and among other discoveries, the Pew researchers found that 84 percent of Egyptians favor the death penalty for people who leave the Muslim religion.
In another survey, Pew found that 90 percent of Egyptians say they believe in freedom of religion. Pew also found that a majority of Egyptians think democracy, with protections of free speech and assembly, is “preferable to any other kind of government.”
How can those attitudes fit together in a democratic post-Mubarak Egypt? It’s no wonder so many people can’t figure out what is next.
The Pew survey found wide streams of opinion in Egypt that seem at the very least inhospitable to democracy. When asked which side they would take in a struggle between “groups who want to modernize the country [and] Islamic fundamentalists,” 59 percent of Egyptians picked the fundamentalists, while 27 percent picked the modernizers.
In a country in which the army will likely play a deciding role in selecting the next political leadership, just 32 percent believe in civilian control of the military. And a majority, 54 percent, support making segregation of men and women in the workplace the law throughout Egypt.
There’s more. When asked whether suicide bombing can ever be justified, 54 percent said yes (although most believe such occasions are “rare.”) Eighty-two percent supported stoning for those who commit adultery. Rest here
Barack Obama has been playing a critical role in making sure that
Egypt, one of our staunchest allies in the Middle East, is positioned to
become the next member of the Union of Iranian Radical Islamist Republics
headed by Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. Every single word out of the president’s
mouth, every single move he’s made has had the effect of stabbing Egyptian
President Hosni Mubarak in the back, of opening the door to Islamist
radicals taking another step on their way to restoring an unholy caliphate in
that region.
The historical precedent for Obama’s actions can be found in those of
another weak liberal Democratic president, Jimmy Carter. In the late 1970s,
the Shah of Iran ruled that country in much the same way Hosni Mubarak
has ruled Egypt, through maintaining tight control over the population with a
strong military and the support of the United States. When Carter withdrew
his support of the Shah in the name of “human rights,” he enabled the
Ayatollah Khomeini to return to Iran from his exile in Paris and assume
leadership of the country.
From and read the rest at http://www.michaelsavage.wnd.com/files/filesSavage/Savage-ObamaGivingMiddleEastToIslamistRadicals-Rev03.pdf
It is simply delirious to suggest that we can work with the Muslim Brotherhood, that the Brotherhood has renounced violence, or that a Brotherhood-led government will ultimately be better for the United States or, for that matter, for Egyptians.
We have two principal interests in the region: peace and anti-terrorism. Say what you will about Mubarak, who has committed abominable abuses and stunted the growth of civil society — albeit in the face of a non-stop terrorist threat that is more immediate and existential than anything we face in the U.S. Mubarak has also kept the peace with Israel, and he has been a real ally against terrorists (as opposed to “allies” who profess allegiance with us but do more to abet than defeat jihadism).
By contrast, the Muslim Brotherhood, which is staunchly opposed to the West and which supports aggression against U.S. forces operating (and promoting democracy) in Muslim countries, is pledged to the destruction of Israel. Hamas is a Brotherhood franchise. The Brotherhood would neither keep the peace nor support our efforts against terrorism. Its doctrine is a pro-terrorist doctrine. If you fall for its claims to be against “terrorism,” you are falling for a word game — they do not consider attacks against Israel or against Western forces in Muslim countries to be terrorism. They consider that to be resistance.
avideditor
Rodan
DJM
Glezele Vayne
