Obama wants to kill us. He is giving guns to gangsters, arming government officials with hollow point bulitsk, and giving the jihadis millions of dollars. The chose is clear this november. I chose life.
Can you believe that Daniel Pearl’s true murderer have been uncovered, but stupid dhimmi 0bama will not go after them or let Pakistan prosecute him themselves.
- by The Associated Press American journalists and students find that the men charged with Pearl’s murder did not commit the crime; Pakistan used perjured testimony.
The four men imprisoned for killing Wall Street Journal reporter Daniel Pearl were not present during his beheading but were convicted of murder because Pakistani authorities knowingly relied on perjured testimony and ignored other leads, says a report released Thursday.
The results of the Pearl Project, an investigation carried out by a team of American journalists and students and spanning more than three years, raise troubling questions about Pakistan’s dysfunctional criminal justice system and underscore the limits US officials face in relying on Pakistani authorities.
Israeli watchdog group NGO Monitor has noted that one of the foreign media’s favorite Gaza-based interviewees, Norwegian physician Mads Gilbert, is a man with an extremist political past.
Gilbert has been quoted widely, including in a Times of London article where he told friends by SMS, “We are wading in death, blood and amputees. Many children. A pregnant woman. I have never experienced anything so terrible.”
Gilbert also used a BBC interview from Gaza’s Shifa Hospital to cite casualty statistics that he said proved the IDF was deliberately targeting civilians.
According to NGO Monitor, however, Gilbert’s past is indicative of “ideological extremism,” such as when he expressed support for the September 11 attacks on the United States in a 2001 interview in Norway’s Dagbladet newspaper.
In the interview, he argued that “the oppressed also have a moral right to attack the USA with any weapon they can come up with,” adding specifically that he supported the terror attack “within the context which I have mentioned.”
Gilbert was also a candidate for local government in 2007 for the Norwegian Red Party, an outgrowth of the radical Norwegian Workers’ Communist Party.
An Israeli government official also told the Post that “there is no way [Gilbert] could have personal access to the kind of statistics he cited. He got them from the Gaza Health Ministry, which is controlled by Hamas. That raises the question: To what extent is he a willing or unwilling mouthpiece for Hamas?”
Mark Levin today on his show explains the severity of the supreme court decision. The liberal judges went against precident and are going to have alot of blood on there hands. I would rather be rulled by a benevolent dictator that want to fight the war on terror then these back stabbing american hating liberals that are doing everything they can to lose the war and allow jihadis to take over america and kill our civilians. I feel wierd praying for a military coup. But the way things are going now, I am just sick. The liberals are supporting tyranny and want to surrender this country to jihads. Mark Levin doesn’t go as far as I just went but he explains how the severity of the decision and how the decision is against the constitution.
Mark levin does a great job of explaining what happend today you should listen.
This is from MarkLevinShow.com
On Thursday’s Mark Levin Show: Today is a must listen for anyone who wants to defend America and the Constitution. Mark discusses the earlier ruling by the Supreme Court that gives rights to enemy detainees. The Justices, in a 5-4 ruling have conferred rights to the enemy terrorists that do not, and should not have any rights under the Constitution! Mark gives a legal walkthrough on the steps that led up to this decision, and how these liberal activist judges have completely disregarded the Constitution, and all legal precedent. The Justices have just made American citizens unsafe in a time that we are at war. The nation will live to regret this one day, as once again our military has another stepping stone when trying to protect the nation.
Mark Levin described today’s 5-4 decision in Boumediene v. Bush as “Five Supreme Court Justices working overtime to confer rights on barbarian terrorists who do not have any rights under our Constitution, and certainly not the rights that they create for these barbarians.” Yet that was only the warm up to Mark really weighing in:
UPDATE: It looks like this post has been dugg called “How Israeli Activists Cheat on Digg In their own words” which I find strange considering the fact that the pro jihadis are the ones gaming digg by reporting their opposition as spam and getting them kicked off digg. The 3rd party tool some one left in my comments doesn’t help anyone cheat digg.com it just show the bias. Diggers don’t for get to read my solution to the “Palestine” problem.
When searching for something in a search engine wikipedia and digg.com stories are usually the first results. It looks as if anti-Semitic moderators at these two sites are trying to rewrite history with anti-Israeli lies. It is important to do what ever we can in order to prevent jihadi propaganda from brainwashing billions of internet users. Do what you can to help win this war against influential misdirected moderators that control the flow of information.
continue reading to hear more about more problems with digg.com .
For the last three years I have been trying to combat the anti-Semetic bigots on digg.com. It got so bad over the last six months that I spent more then two hours a day building up like minded people and creating a collation to combat stories and comments ranging from out right lies about Israel to blood liable to blaming the Jews for all the worlds problems including 9-11.
Two months ago I was kicked out but it was understandable because I was posting muliti paragraph responses and multiple links to clear up misinformation in one comment thread. I was given an option to restore my account, after I complained. But I didn’t want to admit that I was braking the terms of service with the site because I saw so many promoting baseless hatred of the jewish people and jihadi propaganda use the same approach. I also had hundreds of electro-jihadis (extreme leftist and fundamentalist muslims from around the world using electronic means to spread hatred of Jews, Israel, and America, in an attempt to brainwash and demoralize others so Radical Islam can be established world wide) following me, so I decieded to start out fresh.
I changed my practices. I didn’t post multi paragraph responses and I only put one or two different links to overcome jihadi counter points per story. However, yesterday I was kicked out of digg.com. I was for sure not breaking the terms of service. I posted links to a story showing Hamas’s support of Obama. It looks like the digg.com moderators don’t care when people say Hitler was right and put links blaming jews for all the worlds problems, but they do care if one wants to show a different light on someone who they support. When I asked why this time I got a response saying that I was breaking the terms of service and that the decision was final. Keep in mind electro-jihadis post several times more links in the comment section were not banned.
I conclude the only reason I was banned is the ideological values of the digg.com moderators. But I might be wrong in regards to being banned for that Obama link because I also left links in different stories ranging form refuting charge that the Israel Lobby is responsible for the war in Iraq, to posting link in a story pointing out how people calling Israel founding a catastrophe are misguided.
I am starting to document disgusting digg.com comments with screen shoots. I am trying to capture the hate-filled comments next to the advertisements on the page. I think it is important for companies to know what there product is being associated with. It is the advisors that are supporting the hate and paying the salaries of the misguided, jihadi, or just plain evil moderators.
Once I get enough screen shoots I am going to make a short video and lead a campaign to persuade companies to not help fund the hate-fest at digg.com. I could use some help in collecting screen shots and ideas for the short. I am also looking for a good voice for voice overs. Leave a comment if you have a good voice and a microphone. I don’t have the best voice and it is easy to send audio files these days.
Digg.com and wikipedia need fair and unbiased moderators that will ban electro-jihadis not people that are trying to correct them. Wikipedia and Digg.com get top search results. The lies being told at these sites due to poor moderation gives miss information to the billions of internet users that could read these lies and be mislead.
It is important to do something now before it is too late. This amount of miss information if it goes unchecked will result in another holocaust.
UPDATE: It seems as if Digg.com has blocked my IP address from logging in.
UPDATE: Here is more recent coverage. It is more fair and balanced IMHO. Here is the video. It is great that this is getting mainstream media press but Fox is being more Dhimmi to me then fair and balanced. I guess there is no such thing as bad press though. Hopefully the full truth will get out to the main stream public soon. People should be calling into conservative radio stations with info. I don’t really have a phone voice so I will leave it up to my readers. Lets create a real memorial not a tribute to terrorist. RADICAL ISLAM IS THE GREATEST THREAT TO FREEDOM. WE NEED TO FIGHT THE JIHADIS BEFORE IT IS TOO LATE.
Here is the updated blog burst the original one is bellow:
Crescent controversy on Fox News television and Fox News front page!
Check out the Fox News front page today, where “Crescent Outrage” alternates top billing with “Six-Legged Soldiers!” Finally, more than a handful of Americans will at least know that there is a controversy over the Flight 93 memorial.
They won’t get much more than that from Fox’s text report, which is pretty bare. There is no mention of the Mecca orientation of the giant crescent, no mention of the 44 inscribed translucent blocks on the flight path, no mention of the Islamic sundial, and no fact checking (the modern media disease). Still, this is big.
The text report DOES show the side-by-side comparison of the Crescent of Embrace and the Islamic crescent and star insignia. It also reports Tom Burnett’s condemnation of the crescent design as an insult to his murdered son, and it mentions our petition.
This is powerful stuff. Not only do they show the clear likeness between the original design and an Islamic crescent and star flag, but the image they show of the redesign shows pretty clearly how the giant crescent remains intact in the redesign:
From the crescent and star likeness, they cut to Tom Burnett, asking what people would think if a memorial were laid out in the shape of a swastika. If viewers hadn’t just seen the crescent and star likeness, that statement could be made to sound crazy, but Fox does right by Tom, giving viewers the information they need to see the reasonableness of the comparison. Many thanks to Fox for getting this right.
Fox has a lot more information at their disposal. They had a television crew at the Somerset County Courthouse yesterday where Colonel Harry Beam laid out a precise and devastating exposé of Islamic and terrorist memorializing design features, and they were sent extensive fact checking materials. None of this gets into their present reporting. If they put that material into an investigative feature, they can knock the crescent memorial out for good.
UPDATE II: Avid Editor found another completely different Fox News segment on Red Lasso. This one is even better, mentioning the Mecca orientation of the giant crescent!
Here is the original blog burst:
Crescent controversy on Fox News television and Fox News front page!
Check out the Fox News front page today, where “Crescent Outrage” alternates top billing with “Six-Legged Soldiers!” Finally, more than a handful of Americans will at least know that there is a controversy over the Flight 93 memorial.
They won’t know much more than that. The Fox reporting is pretty bare, and includes no mention of the Mecca orientation of the giant crescent, no mention of the 44 inscribed translucent blocks on the flight path, no mention of the Islamic sundial, and no fact checking (the modern media disease). Still, this is big.
Fox IS airing the side-by-side comparison of the Crescent of Embrace and the Islamic crescent. They also report Tom Burnett’s condemnation of the crescent design an insult to his murdered son, and they mention our petition.
Fox has a lot more information at their disposal. They had a television crew to the Somerset County Courthouse yesterday where Colonel Harry Beam laid out a precise and devastating exposé of Islamic and terrorist memorializing design features, and they were sent extensive fact checking materials. None of this gets into their present reporting. Hopefully they will be using this material for an investigative feature in the not-too-distant future.
World Net Daily has a very informative article today about our petition to investigate the Flight 93 memorial. It includes excerpts from Tom Burnett’s letter to the American people; it includes information about the fraudulent Park Service investigation (where an Islamic scholar said not to worry about the half mile wide Mecca oriented crescent because nobody has ever seen a mihrab anywhere near this BIG before); and it reviews the four specific complaints highlighted in the petition (the giant crescent, the Mecca orientation, the Islamic sundial and the 44 blocks).
Those last four links are to graphics that Tom Burnett is going to have on poster-boards when he addresses a Republican convention in Wisconsin at the end of the month. World Net Daily is looking to add video content these days so Tom is going to try to get video of his speech that we can edit down to five minutes of highlights for WND.
The first place we will be delivering the petitions is to the Memorial Project’s public meeting on May 3rd in Somerset PA. It looks like we are going to have quite a few signatures, both from the electronic petition (zooming towards 2000 already), and from the paper petitions (now circulating on the ground in PA).
At least one state legislator from Pennsylvania has signed the petition, and a Congressman has expressed interest in entering the whole thing into the congressional record. That would be a second Congressman coming out publicly against the memorial. (Tom Tancredo asked the Park Service last fall to scrap the crescent design entirely.)
Will any of the big radio radio voices wake up to the evidence that al Qaeda accepted our open invitation to the ENTIRE WORLD to enter our design competition? All they have to do is look at the FACTS.
To join our blogbursts, email Cao (caoilfhionn1 at gmail dot com) with your blog’s url.
CNN Spin for Obama: “On Anderson Cooper’s CNN blog, Roland S. Martin spins out of control in an effort to help sweep up the mess left from pastorgate. He claims that Rev. Wright was only quoting Edward Peck, former U.S. Ambassador to Iraq and deputy director of President Reagan’s terrorism task force. He is particularly claiming that the controversial sermon that the ‘chickens have come home to roost’ was a quote from Peck. He goes on to provide what I guess is supposed to be the quote in question. However, if you watch the very start of the video above, Wright says straight out who this particular quote comes from….Malcom X!
One of the most controversial statements in this sermon was when he mentioned ‘chickens coming home to roost.’ He was actually quoting Edward Peck, former U.S. Ambassador to Iraq and deputy director of President Reagan’s terrorism task force, who was speaking on FOX News. That’s what he told the congregation.He was quoting Peck as saying that America’s foreign policy has put the nation in peril:‘We took this country by terror away from the Sioux, the Apache, Arikara, the Comanche, the Arapaho, the Navajo. Terrorism.‘We took Africans away from their country to build our way of ease and kept them enslaved and living in fear. Terrorism.‘We bombed Grenada and killed innocent civilians, babies, non-military personnel.‘We bombed the black civilian community of Panama with stealth bombers and killed unarmed teenage and toddlers, pregnant mothers and hard working fathers.‘We bombed Qaddafi’s home, and killed his child. Blessed are they who bash your children’s head against the rock.‘We bombed Iraq. We killed unarmed civilians trying to make a living. We bombed a plant in Sudan to pay back for the attack on our embassy, killed hundreds of hard working people, mothers and fathers who left home to go that day not knowing that they’d never get back home.‘We bombed Hiroshima. We bombed Nagasaki, and we nuked far more than the thousands in New York and the Pentagon and we never batted an eye.‘Kids playing in the playground. Mothers picking up children after school. Civilians, not soldiers, people just trying to make it day by day.‘We have supported state terrorism against the Palestinians and black South Africans, and now we are indignant because the stuff that we have done overseas is now brought right back into our own front yards. America’s chickens are coming home to roost.‘Violence begets violence. Hatred begets hatred. And terrorism begets terrorism. A white ambassador said that y’all, not a black militant. Not a reverend who preaches about racism. An ambassador whose eyes are wide open and who is trying to get us to wake up and move away from this dangerous precipice upon which we are now poised. The ambassador said the people we have wounded don’t have the military capability we have. But they do have individuals who are willing to die and take thousands with them. And we need to come to grips with that.’
It is interesting that I didn’t see any quote at all in the above that says anything about ‘chickens coming home to roost.’Confederate Yankee fills us in on where the quote was more likely to have come from:
The most famous single citation of ‘The Chickens Coming Home to Roost’ was as an alternate title of the Malcolm X speech, God’s Judgement of White America, where X attributed the assassination death of John F. Kennedy to the historical evils of white America at that time.I suspect that is a far more likely source for Wright’s invocation of that particular phrase, especially when we consider the historical contexts of both Wright’s speech after 9/11, and X’s speech after Kennedy was killed.At best, Jeremiah Wright credits here a ‘A white ambassador’ for saying ‘Violence begets violence. Hatred begets hatred. And terrorism begets terrorism.’There is no support provided by Martin for the claim that Peck said anything about ‘chickens coming home to roost,’ or any of the rest of what he cited.
So, CNN: He was just quoting Peck, huh? Just putting Peck’s quote into ‘context’?Gee, funny how such a key quote — the one you claim lets Wright off the hook — is entirely absent from your lying article.
More from Confederate Yankee:
Wright does indeed invoke Peck, and in particular, where Peck invokes the specific Malcolm X speech cited above.In short, Martin is being duplicitous when he claims that Wright was citing Peck, he was instead citing Malcom X through Peck.
In the long run it doesn’t really matter who Wright was quoting. He spoke it and believed it. The only reason it matters is another example of dishonesty and bias in the MSM. Its an obvious spin.
