The answer is, Al Gore didn’t become a laughingstock at the Apple meeting. The guy’s always been a laughingstock.
CNET reports the continuing disintegration of the Gore lore:
The presence of one of the world’s pre-eminent environmentalists at Apple’s shareholder meeting Thursday was the subject of much of the morning’s pointed discussion.
As expected, Apple’s attitude on environmental and sustainability issues was one of the main concerns of the stockholders present Thursday, followed closely by the company’s immense pile of cash. But early harsh comments about former Vice President Al Gore’s record set the tone.
Gore was seated in the first row, along with his six fellow board members, in Apple’s Town Hall auditorium as several stockholders took turns either bashing or praising his high-profile views on climate change.
At the first opportunity for audience participation just several minutes into the proceeding, a longtime and well-known Apple (AAPL) shareholder–some would say gadfly–who introduced himself as Sheldon, stood at the microphone and urged against Gore’s re-election to the board. Gore “has become a laughingstock. The glaciers have not melted,” Sheldon said, referring to Gore’s views on global warming. “If his advice he gives to Apple is as faulty as his views on the environment then he doesn’t need to be re-elected.”
While this attitude might crush the spirit of lesser men, it is not expected to bother Gore. Not being elected is nothing new to him.
The only advice I have for them is educated the people about the tyranny the jihadis impose. I bet the majority of the British people are against Sharia and other insane impositions of the Jihadis.
Also hidden cameras are now really really cheap. Record what the jihadis are saying and post the recordings on youtube or another service anon. Read the rest of this entry »
An interview with House of Lords Baroness Caroline Cox (most notorious alongside Lord Pearson for inviting Geert Wilders to screen Fitna in the House of Lords in February 2009) on the 10th April 1992 massacre and plunder of Armenian civilians by Azeri combatants in the village of Maraghar during the Nagorno-Karabakh War between Armenia and Azerbaijan (1988-1994). Baroness Cox remains one of the few in Europe fully cognizant of the theology of Jihad at-Talab and the threat its zealous practitioners today pose to the preservation of Western Civilization, as well as of the danger surrounding the current unimpeded Muslim immigration into Europe sans survivalist preconditions of assimilation and rejection of Shari’a. She is one of Europe’s few staunch defenders of besieged kaffir nations around the world — Israel, Artsakh, and Sudanese Christians foremost — and for that her name ought to be heralded to the rooftops, as there are few who possess such intellectual lucidity and strength today.
Warning: the following photographs are not recommended for the weak of heart, spine, spleen, stomach, or mind… Read the rest of this entry »
This Saudi alim casts off the obfuscating veil of taqiyya and kithman, and lays it out on the line — asserting Islam’s intrinsic belligerency and its undying goal to subdue the world via al-sayyaf and impose its Shari’a to the displeasure of the kuffar. He vehemently excoriates the present generation of the Jama’ah for their lack of zealotry in the realm of Jihad and ghazwat, and pleads for a “renaissance” within academia and media et al in the study and practice of holy war in order to make Allah‘s Shari’a prevail over kufr and shirk.
A nation of qatila…of killing…
Such a nation is a perpetual threat…such a nation is the Ummat al-Muslimin…
The woman who’s being beheaded in the video above is a Chechen — a White Eastern European (North Caucasus) Slave of Allah… Read the rest of this entry »
UPDATE: I have no problem with libertarians that are not isolationist. The problem I have is promoting a 3rd party because that will ensure the progressives take over. I saw the show and I saw him promoting one. I hope I am wrong and he will elaborate it more on Monday. I agree with beck that exporting democracy to the muslim world is like teaching an ape table manners But I think he crossed the line. I hope my opinions are more clear now. I am in no way calling Beck Hitler like some. Again I hope I am wrong but I fear I may be right.
The jihadi loving paper that lies to promote the enemy agenda is now reporting this
” But the simplest explanation, that the Iranians had no choice, has its proponents. The fuel is stored in one big, specialized cask. When someone ordered that the fuel begin being fed into the giant centrifuges for further enrichment, engineers moved it to the only spot available — the exposed plant. Or, as one American intelligence official said, “You can’t dismiss the possibility that this is a screw-up.” read the rest
I personally do not trust the NYT or think dinner jacket is that stupid. In case I am wrong on the first account bomb Iran now. Incase I am wrong on the second account. Then Jihadis please find your closet gun and shoot yourselves in the head. I heard Allah wants to meet you
“Narrated ‘Aun bin Abu Juhaifa: My father bought a slave who practiced the profession of cupping. (My father broke the slave’s instruments of cupping). I asked my father why he had done so. He replied, “The Prophet…cursed the picture-makers.”"–Sahih Bukhari Volume 3 Book 34 Number 299
“We were with Masruq at the house of Yasar bin Numair. Masruq saw pictures on his terrace and said, “I heard ‘Abdullah saying that he heard the Prophet saying, “‘The people who will receive the severest punishment from Allah will be the picture makers.”–Sahih Bukhari Volume 7 Book 72 Number 834
“Narrated Aisha: Allah’s Apostle said, “The painter of these pictures will be punished on the Day of Resurrection, and it will be said to them, Make alive what you have created.’ “–Sahih Bukhari Volume 9 Book 93 Number 646
“ ”a Deen that advocates slavery, women as life support systems for uteruses, and killing anyone not Muslim is not a religion” The very word deen (or din) doesn’t mean religion in the way we see it, anyway…it’s a bad translation; a better definition would probably be “a totalitarian system of theocratic government dictating even one’s lifestyle habits “
Kashmiri Pandit Human Rights Advocate Ashok Pandit’s Documentaries on the “Jihad” Waged Against Kashmiri Pandits
“Abu Hurayrah…said that the Messenger of Allah…said, “A group of you will conquer India, Allah will open for them [India] until they come with its kings chained – Allah having forgiven their sins – when they return back [from India], they will find son of Maryam [PD: 'Isa bin Maryam, aka the Islamic "Jesus"] in Syria.”"–“al-Fitan”, Na’im bin Hammad
“Thawban…[said] that the Messenger of Allah…said, “Two groups of my Ummah Allah has protected from the hellfire: a group that will conquer India and a group that will be with ‘Eessa son of Maryam.”"–“Tarikh al-Firishta” and “Tarikh al-Baghdadi”; Ahmad, an-Nisa’i, and at-Tabarani
“Abu Hurayrah said, “The Messenger of Allah promised us the conquest of India. If I was to come across that I will spend my soul and wealth. If I am killed then I am among the best of martyrs. And if I return then I am Abu Hurayrah the freed.”–Ahmad, an-Nisa’i, and al-Hakim
Watch Ashok Pandit’s documentaries, posted below, for some heart-rending revelations on the plight of the forgotten and forsaken Kashmiri Pandit Hindu refugees Read the rest of this entry »
Ayn Rand’s Wisdom on the Nature of Genocide, and the Applicability of Her Perspective to an Understanding of Jihad Theology
“There is no principle by which genocide—a crime against a group of men—can be regarded as morally different from (or worse than) a crime against an individual: the difference is only quantitative, not moral. It can be easily demonstrated that Communism means and requires the extermination—the genocide, if you wish—of a particular human species: the men of ability.”–Ayn Rand, “The Objectivist Calendar” June 1978
Merely add “the men of persistent, unvarying kufr” (disbelief, refusal to Submit) alongside the “men of ability” to the above quote — and you comprehend the dastardly aims of the perpetual institution of Jihad at-Talab/Jihad bi-l-Saif…Read the rest of this entry »
PRINCETON, NJ — For the first time since 1991, more than 6 in 10 Americans — 63% — say their sympathies in the Middle East situation lie more with the Israelis than with the Palestinians. Fifteen percent side more with the Palestinians, down slightly from recent years, while a combined 23% favor both sides, favor neither side, or have no opinion.
avideditor
Rodan
DJM
Glezele Vayne
But I think he crossed the line. I hope my opinions are more clear now. 
